the recording

I've read the page you sent. They weren't just warned. They decided the office wasn't to be told.

That's the instruction not to warn them. I thought you might know who could have made that decision.

No name yet. But it names the office. They can't say it was a warning about somewhere else.

Was the person who sent it working with you? I thought that might explain why it came to us.

No one I know. I can't tell you who sent it.

I want to know what the core processor is. Everything they've watched is going through it before anyone gets told what it means.

We're following the decision not to act. Send anything else about that. I'll send you the recording we discussed for the site; you can use it with your existing arguments.