Rrustred21 Mar 2021 · 16:31 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by rustredThey put other names on the list. Even their own recording wouldn't account for that↑20pointsReplyLinkMmothproof21 Mar 2021 · 16:45 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by mothproofIt doesn't say there was a sound recording. Somebody may have been listening and writing↑11pointsReplyLinkRrustred21 Mar 2021 · 17:00 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by rustredThat doesn't make adding the names any better↑9pointsReplyLink
Mmothproof21 Mar 2021 · 16:45 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by mothproofIt doesn't say there was a sound recording. Somebody may have been listening and writing↑11pointsReplyLinkRrustred21 Mar 2021 · 17:00 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by rustredThat doesn't make adding the names any better↑9pointsReplyLink
Rrustred21 Mar 2021 · 17:00 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by rustredThat doesn't make adding the names any better↑9pointsReplyLink
Ccansleeve21 Mar 2021 · 16:02 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by cansleeveSo where was the microphone?↑18pointsReplyLinkIindexcard21 Mar 2021 · 16:14 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by indexcardThe police wouldn't identify it in this report↑6pointsReplyLink
Iindexcard21 Mar 2021 · 16:14 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by indexcardThe police wouldn't identify it in this report↑6pointsReplyLink
Mmetricsea21 Mar 2021 · 17:24 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by metricseaI keep seeing this cropped at the certificate. The families at the bottom are the reason for the hearing↑12pointsReplyLinkIindexcard21 Mar 2021 · 17:43 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by indexcardI've left the full page in↑8pointsReplyLink
Iindexcard21 Mar 2021 · 17:43 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by indexcardI've left the full page in↑8pointsReplyLink
Tteaspoon21 Mar 2021 · 18:11 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by teaspoonWas there another report after it?↑4pointsReplyLinkIindexcard22 Mar 2021 · 08:20 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by indexcardNot one I've found yet. There are other papers from the same incident.↑5pointsReplyLink
Iindexcard22 Mar 2021 · 08:20 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by indexcardNot one I've found yet. There are other papers from the same incident.↑5pointsReplyLink
Nnailbrush22 Mar 2021 · 09:06 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by nailbrushis that the same Edwin Voss from the circus paper?↑4pointsReplyLinkRrustred22 Mar 2021 · 09:38 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by rustredMaybe. I still want to know who added the names of people who weren't at the gardens.↑4pointsReplyLink
Rrustred22 Mar 2021 · 09:38 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by rustredMaybe. I still want to know who added the names of people who weren't at the gardens.↑4pointsReplyLink
I found this while looking through the old exhibition reports. The police used private conversations in an investigation, and some of the people they went after had not even been at the gardens. Whole report.
−+Collapse or expand reply by rustred
They put other names on the list. Even their own recording wouldn't account for that
−+Collapse or expand reply by mothproof
It doesn't say there was a sound recording. Somebody may have been listening and writing
−+Collapse or expand reply by rustred
That doesn't make adding the names any better
−+Collapse or expand reply by cansleeve
So where was the microphone?
−+Collapse or expand reply by indexcard
The police wouldn't identify it in this report
−+Collapse or expand reply by metricsea
I keep seeing this cropped at the certificate. The families at the bottom are the reason for the hearing
−+Collapse or expand reply by indexcard
I've left the full page in
−+Collapse or expand reply by teaspoon
Was there another report after it?
−+Collapse or expand reply by indexcard
Not one I've found yet. There are other papers from the same incident.
−+Collapse or expand reply by nailbrush
is that the same Edwin Voss from the circus paper?
−+Collapse or expand reply by rustred
Maybe. I still want to know who added the names of people who weren't at the gardens.