03 Climate
Due to the claims in regards to the aforementioned habitat requirements of the giraffe, we are able to infer one of the groups playing a role in the conspiracy. Anti-climate change groups have furthered the giraffe in order to convince the public that a 20 foot tall mammal can survive on desert trees to create public confusion about the state of the global environment.
The conversation
People keep answering Climate Change Error as if the claim were that a giraffe changes the weather. The claim is that getting people to accept this much animal living on that little landscape changes what they are prepared to believe about the landscape.
“survive on desert trees” is the bit I keep coming back to. You are shown a huge body and a few branches, then told the combination is ordinary. If the picture works, nobody asks what has to be supplied outside it.
The animal gets all the attention and the trees become background. That is a very effective way of making the background seem sufficient.
You have put a quantity in the argument without measuring it. “A few branches” in one photograph is not the total food available.
The preceding habitat argument matters here. This paragraph takes that objection as established; it does not start by proving it again.
Why would an anti-climate group pick this animal? Would a small animal living on very little make the same point with less to explain?
Flat Giraffers