Mmothproof03 Sep 2022 · 15:28 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by mothproofIf people thought it was gone and then somebody exhibited one, of course the next edition would change↑25pointsReplyLinkVvellum03 Sep 2022 · 15:49 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by vellumI'm asking why the later text skips the argument about the exhibit↑13pointsReplyLink
Vvellum03 Sep 2022 · 15:49 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by vellumI'm asking why the later text skips the argument about the exhibit↑13pointsReplyLink
Fflatlander03 Sep 2022 · 16:03 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by flatlanderThey replaced the explanation with the photograph↑17pointsReplyLinkmarl03 Sep 2022 · 16:24 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by marlAnd then the photograph became the explanation↑8pointsReplyLink
marl03 Sep 2022 · 16:24 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by marlAnd then the photograph became the explanation↑8pointsReplyLink
Hhalfstep03 Sep 2022 · 17:12 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by halfstepDoes the publisher say where the photo came from?↑9pointsReplyLinkVvellum03 Sep 2022 · 17:31 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by vellumNot on that page↑5pointsReplyLink
Mmetricsea03 Sep 2022 · 18:22 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by metricseaThe date on the scan is when the scan was added. The dates on the title pages are the ones that matter here↑6pointsReplyLinkVvellum04 Sep 2022 · 11:19 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by vellumI've put the title pages after each entry.↑4pointsReplyLink
Vvellum04 Sep 2022 · 11:19 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by vellumI've put the title pages after each entry.↑4pointsReplyLink
Fflatlander04 Sep 2022 · 13:52 UTC−+Collapse or expand reply by flatlanderIf Voss was making the one in the circus paper, who decided that counted as finding the species again?↑5pointsReplyLink
Two editions of the same illustrated book. The earlier one has the giraffe in the lost animals. The later one has a photograph and calls it an animal from a collection. Both pages.
−+Collapse or expand reply by mothproof
If people thought it was gone and then somebody exhibited one, of course the next edition would change
−+Collapse or expand reply by vellum
I'm asking why the later text skips the argument about the exhibit
−+Collapse or expand reply by flatlander
They replaced the explanation with the photograph
−+Collapse or expand reply by marl
And then the photograph became the explanation
−+Collapse or expand reply by halfstep
Does the publisher say where the photo came from?
−+Collapse or expand reply by vellum
Not on that page
−+Collapse or expand reply by metricsea
The date on the scan is when the scan was added. The dates on the title pages are the ones that matter here
−+Collapse or expand reply by vellum
I've put the title pages after each entry.
−+Collapse or expand reply by flatlander
If Voss was making the one in the circus paper, who decided that counted as finding the species again?